How to Challenge a Sales Tax Assessment in Islamabad & Peshawar — Practical Guide? - Nouman Muhib Kakakhel

How to Challenge a Sales Tax Assessment in Islamabad & Peshawar — Practical Guide?

Navigating a sales tax assessment can be a complex and daunting task for businesses and individuals when the tax authority imposes a liability that appears unjust or incorrect. In Pakistan, sales tax disputes often stem from audits, miscalculations, or misinterpretations of intricate tax regulations. For taxpayers in Islamabad, the federal capital, and Peshawar, the hub of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), understanding the process to challenge these assessments is essential to protect financial interests. This comprehensive guide offers a practical, step-by-step approach to contesting sales tax assessments, leveraging both federal and provincial legal frameworks to achieve fair resolutions. Nouman Muhib Kakakhel – Lawyer & Legal Consultant stresses the importance of acting promptly upon receiving an assessment order to meet strict deadlines and avoid penalties, ensuring taxpayers can effectively address disputes.

Recent legislative updates, including the Tax Laws (Amendment) Act 2024 and Finance Act 2025, have streamlined appeal processes, removed monetary thresholds, and promoted alternative dispute resolution (ADR), making it easier to challenge assessments efficiently. This blog outlines the legal avenues and practical steps tailored to Islamabad and Peshawar.

This foundation is critical for pursuing effective sales tax challenges.

Legal Framework Governing Sales Tax Challenges

The legal structure for challenging sales tax assessments in Pakistan varies by jurisdiction. In Islamabad, the Sales Tax Act 1990, administered by the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR), governs taxation on goods, with Sections 31 (appeal to Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals)) and 46 (Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue (ATIR)) outlining appeal procedures. The Tax Laws (Amendment) Act 2024 eliminated pecuniary limits, allowing direct appeals to ATIR for disputes exceeding PKR 20 million, bypassing the Commissioner for faster resolutions. The Finance Act 2025 introduced Compliance Risk Management (CRM) for input tax limits, appealable by taxpayers. Section 31A promotes ADR through FBR-formed committees, resolvable within 120 days.

In Peshawar, the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Sales Tax on Services Act 2013, managed by the KPK Revenue Authority (KPRA), applies to services, with Sections 33 and 34 detailing appeals to the Commissioner (Appeals) KPRA and Appellate Tribunal. The KPK Finance Act 2024 expanded assessment scopes, targeting non-compliant service providers, and extended stay periods to 180 days. Both jurisdictions incorporate the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 for procedural aspects, with the Islamabad High Court (IHC) and Peshawar High Court (PHC) handling writ petitions under Article 199 for jurisdictional or legal errors.

This dual framework is essential for navigating tax appeals successfully.

Grounds for Challenging a Sales Tax Assessment

Taxpayers can contest assessments on several well-defined grounds to ensure their challenge is robust. Procedural irregularities, such as inadequate or improperly served show-cause notices under Section 25 of the 1990 Act (federal) or equivalent KPRA provisions, violate principles of natural justice and provide a strong basis for appeal. Factual errors, including incorrect input tax calculations, misclassification of taxable supplies, or erroneous liability estimates, are common, particularly in sectors like manufacturing or retail. Legal misinterpretations, such as wrongful denial of exemptions under the Sixth Schedule of the 1990 Act or misapplication of service tax rates, also justify challenges. Recent Supreme Court rulings in 2025 clarified that input tax adjustments need not occur in the same period as consumption, expanding grounds for disputes. In Peshawar, errors in KPRA’s electronic tracking under Section 64 of the 2013 Act offer additional avenues.

Building a case with documented evidence, such as tax invoices, audit responses, or correspondence, strengthens the challenge for assessment disputes.

Experience Compassion

We provide compassionate legal support, ensuring clients feel heard, respected, and guided through every step.

Integrity Compassion

Our practice is built on honesty and empathy, delivering ethical and client-focused legal solutions.

Step-by-Step Process to Challenge a Federal Assessment in Islamabad

Challenging a federal sales tax assessment in Islamabad requires adherence to a structured process under the Sales Tax Act 1990, with strict timelines to preserve appeal rights:

Review the Assessment Order: Upon receiving the order through FBR’s IRIS portal, carefully analyze it within 30 days for errors in calculations, procedural lapses, or legal misapplications, as this initiates the appeal period under Section 31.
File Appeal to Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals): Submit a memorandum of appeal to the CIR(Appeals) at the Regional Tax Office (RTO) Islamabad, including detailed grounds, supporting evidence (e.g., invoices, returns), and a 10% deposit of the disputed tax amount, which may be waived for financial hardship. Appeals under PKR 100,000 incur no fee; others require nominal fees. The timeline is 30 days from order receipt, extendable to 60 days with sufficient cause.
Request Stay of Recovery: Apply for an interim stay under Section 31(4) with a 10-25% deposit to halt recovery; the CIR(Appeals) decides within 30 days, with stays lasting up to 180 days per 2024 amendments.
Attend Hearing and Receive Decision: The CIR(Appeals) schedules a hearing, disposing of the appeal within 90-180 days, potentially remanding the case for reassessment if errors are found.
Appeal to Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue: If dissatisfied, file an appeal to the ATIR Islamabad bench within 60 days under Section 46A, with a 20% deposit. Direct appeals are permitted for disputes exceeding PKR 20 million, bypassing CIR(Appeals).
Reference to Islamabad High Court: For substantial questions of law, file a reference within 90 days under Section 47A to the IHC.
Explore ADR: At any stage, apply for ADR under Section 31A; the FBR forms a committee to resolve the dispute within 120 days, offering a faster alternative.

E-filing through the IRIS portal ensures efficiency and transparency in Islamabad tax challenges.

Step-by-Step Process to Challenge a KPRA Assessment in Peshawar

For services sales tax assessments in Peshawar, the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Sales Tax on Services Act 2013 governs, with a parallel appeal structure:

Analyze the Assessment Order: Review the KPRA-issued order within 30 days via their online portal or physical delivery, identifying errors in tax computation, procedure, or legal application.
File Appeal to Commissioner (Appeals) KPRA: Submit an appeal to KPRA’s Hayatabad office, including grounds, evidence, and a 10% deposit of the disputed amount. Fees range from PKR 1,000 to PKR 5,000 based on the dispute’s value. The timeline is 30 days, extendable to 60 days with justification.
Seek Stay of Recovery: Apply for a stay under Section 33(4) with a 10-25% deposit to pause enforcement; stays extend up to 180 days per 2024 amendments.
Participate in Hearing: The Commissioner (Appeals) disposes of the appeal within 90-120 days, with the option to remand for reassessment.
Appeal to Appellate Tribunal: If unresolved, file to KPK’s Appellate Tribunal in Peshawar within 60 days under Section 34, with a 20% deposit.
Reference to Peshawar High Court: For legal errors, file a reference within 90 days under Section 35 to the PHC.
Pursue ADR: KPRA facilitates ADR committees for resolutions within 120 days, ideal for amicable settlements in community-driven disputes.

Submissions may be physical or online via KPRA’s system, with Peshawar’s local office ensuring accessibility for Peshawar tax appeals.

Specific Considerations for Islamabad

Islamabad’s federal framework, supported by the FBR’s centralized IRIS portal, streamlines e-filing and appeal tracking, with submissions processed at RTO Islamabad. The 2025 CRM input tax limits allow direct challenges for high-value commercial assessments, particularly in sectors like imports, manufacturing, or retail. The IHC frequently hears writ petitions for procedural violations, such as defective notices, but requires exhaustion of statutory remedies (CIR and ATIR) before judicial review. Stays are granted for genuine cases, though a 25% deposit is standard to halt recovery actions. For international trade disputes, the 2011 Act ensures consistency in cross-border assessments. Navigating this system demands digital proficiency and prompt filings to meet deadlines, leveraging Islamabad’s advanced infrastructure.

These factors enhance success in federal tax disputes.

Specific Considerations for Peshawar

In Peshawar, the KPRA focuses on service sectors like construction, hospitality, and advertising, with 2024 amendments expanding assessments to non-compliant providers through electronic monitoring. Appeals are filed at KPRA’s Hayatabad office, where physical hearings predominate due to limited e-filing infrastructure compared to Islamabad. The PHC addresses provincial nuances, such as exemptions for tribal areas, in references under Section 35. Stays up to 180 days alleviate financial strain, particularly for small businesses, but cultural factors in KPK often favor ADR for community or family-related service disputes. Record retention requirements, reduced to six years post-2024, simplify compliance. Local expertise in KPK’s tax regime and cultural context is crucial for effective challenges.

These considerations optimize outcomes in provincial tax disputes.

Role of Legal Professionals in Challenges

Legal professionals play a pivotal role in navigating the complexities of sales tax laws, drafting precise appeal memoranda, and compiling robust evidence, such as tax invoices, audit responses, or correspondence. They strategize ADR for quicker resolutions, represent clients at hearings, and ensure compliance with deposit requirements and tight timelines. In Islamabad, expertise in FBR’s digital systems and IHC precedents enhances efficiency; in Peshawar, knowledge of KPRA’s processes and PHC jurisprudence prevents procedural errors. Legal counsel also advises on writ petitions for jurisdictional issues and negotiates settlements in ADR committees. Nouman Muhib Kakakhel – Lawyer & Legal Consultant provides specialized support, from initial order reviews to tribunal and court advocacy, ensuring strong representation.

Engaging experts is critical for success in tax litigation.

Common Challenges and Best Practices

Taxpayers face several hurdles when challenging assessments. Strict 30-day appeal deadlines mean delays can forfeit rights, while deposit requirements (10-25% of disputed tax) strain cash flow, particularly for small businesses. Enforcement actions may continue during appeal pendency despite stays, and tribunal backlogs, exacerbated post-2024 direct appeal provisions, can delay resolutions. Best practices include responding promptly to show-cause notices to preempt adverse orders, maintaining comprehensive digital or physical records, and exploring ADR early to avoid protracted appeals. Utilize FBR or KPRA portals for efficient filings, and stay updated on Finance Act 2025 changes, such as CRM input tax appeals. Engaging legal counsel early prevents procedural defaults and strengthens arguments.

These strategies improve outcomes in tax challenge processes.

Conclusion

Challenging a sales tax assessment in Islamabad and Peshawar requires a thorough understanding of federal (FBR) and provincial (KPRA) frameworks, adherence to strict timelines, and strategic use of appeals and ADR. By following structured processes, documenting evidence meticulously, and leveraging professional expertise, taxpayers can contest liabilities effectively, ensuring fair treatment under updated 2024-2025 laws. For tailored guidance, contact Nouman Muhib Kakakhel – Lawyer & Legal Consultant to navigate your sales tax dispute with precision and confidence.